<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:iw="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">
  <owl:Class rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#Team"/>
  <owl:Class rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#DeclarativeRule"/>
  <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#firstSubmissionDate"/>
  <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#name"/>
  <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#lastSubmissionDate"/>
  <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#submitter"/>
  <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#englishDescription"/>
  <iw:DeclarativeRule rdf:about="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/registry/DPR/Cut.owl#Cut"
     iw:firstSubmissionDate="20041014145053"
     iw:lastSubmissionDate="20041014150654"
     iw:name="Cut">
    <iw:englishDescription>This is a special kind of a reasoning step. When a reasoner returns a cut reasoning step, it means that there are no more solutions left for the goal of the reasoning step. For example, if a relation is a function, i.e. it has only one value, and the query is for this value, then a reasoner might return one "normal" reasoning step with the answer, and then a cut reasoning step indicating that the search for more answers would be futile, at least within the indicated depth limit.  </iw:englishDescription>
    <iw:submitter rdf:resource="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/registry/TM/IW-TEAM.owl#IW-TEAM"
       rdf:type="http://inferenceweb.stanford.edu/2004/07/iw.owl#Team"/>
  </iw:DeclarativeRule>
</rdf:RDF>
